We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

A handheld device that performs a range of chemical tests and transmits the results for remote analysis through a standard mobile phone call could be commercially available within 12 months.

The device, known as the uMED (universal Mobile Electrochemical Detector), could cost as little as US$10 to buy once a manufacturing process is in place, its developers say. It can detect levels of glucose or malaria-causing parsites in blood, salts in urine, and toxic metals in water.

The device plugs into the audio port of a mobile phone and transmits its test results to a cloud server as a series of coded tones through a standard (2G) audio phone call. Usually 3G and 4G networks are required to transmit remote diagnostics, but in the developing world their coverage can be patchy.

“The device would connect to any cell phone,” says Alex Nemiroski, a chemist at Harvard University in the United States and one of the device’s developers. This is important because “there are cell phones and 2G networks all over, even in places where there are no roads and no running water”, he says.

Another advantage of the uMED is that it can operate for months at a time on a single battery charge, he adds.

“The device is really simple to use,” he says. A user just inserts a test strip into the device, selects the test, applies the sample of blood, urine or water to the test strip and makes a phone call, which automatically transfers the results.

Patients can receive their diagnosis — potentially by SMS message — once the results have been analysed remotely by an expert, says Nemiroski. The results could also be automatically archived, he suggests, allowing governments to survey the spread of disease, for example. 

The simple construction of the uMED, and the fact that it uses an open-source controller unit, means it can be reprogrammed and adapted to local needs or conditions, he says.

Nemiroski and colleagues published a paper outlining the device in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in June. The uMED is currently undergoing field trials in India.

Conor Hogan of the Institute of Molecular Science at La Trobe University, Australia, says the device is interesting because users don't need to have an internet connection to send off the results.

“A lot of the latest developments within the area of low-cost sensing and e-health have tended to focus on smart phones,” he says. But “doing it the most basic way possible makes it available to the widest number of people, especially those in resource-poor environments”.

Nemiroski says the team is trying to increase the number of tests uMED can perform using one test strip, and working on incorporating different types of detection, such as optical sensing.

Link to abstract in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences


PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405679111 (2014)