Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

Focus on Migration: The positive legacy of refugee camps
  • Focus on Migration: The positive legacy of refugee camps

Copyright: Sanjit Das / Panos

Speed read

  • Refugee camps seem to bring wider economic benefits, for example through trade

  • This impact often remains even after camps are closed

  • Local people may have gained skills by taking on refugee-related jobs

Shares
On 2 April, members of the Al-Shabaab Islamic militant group attacked Garissa University in Kenya, killing nearly 150 people. Soon after, the Kenyan government ordered the closure of the Dadaab refugee camp complex, where it believes Al-Shabaab has been operating for some time and which lies 100 kilometres from the university.

Kenya’s deputy president said the Kenyan authorities will relocate the refugees if UNHCR (the UN refugee agency) fails to do so. The camp complex was established more than two decades ago and hosts hundreds of thousands of Somali refugees.

UNHCR has urged the Kenyan authorities to reconsider their position, highlighting the human cost of closing the camps and citing international legal obligations towards refugees.

But as well as considering the opposing priorities of national security versus the humanitarian and legal responsibilities, the economic consequences of closing the camps should be examined too.

Evidence suggests that, overall, having a refugee camp in an area is economically beneficial. [1] Many reports suggest that refugees in camps are not economically isolated from host communities, as the public often assumes. [2] In fact, refugees interact frequently with host communities, an interaction that includes major trade relationships.

In the case of the Dadaab refugee camp, a 2010 report estimated the income for the host community from selling milk to the refugees at US$1.2 million for that year. The trade in meat accounted for US$1.8 million in the same year. [3]

This is not wholly unexpected. A sudden increase in an area’s population brings a rise in demand for goods and services. Refugees also increase a region’s workforce, and producers can take advantage of the cheap labour supply. Finally, the presence of international organisations helping with the crisis boosts demand for products and services such as food, housing and transport.

More surprising is the evidence suggesting that the economic impact of refugee camps often outlasts the existence of these camps. And it persists even after the refugees have returned home.

For instance, a study looking at the Kagera region of Tanzania, which experienced large refugee inflows from Burundi and Rwanda in the 1990s, suggests that, even after the refugees had returned home, the local Tanzanian population still had higher consumption levels. [4] This effect seemed to be driven by a drop in transport costs because of roads built to serve the refugee camps.

Other studies explore how the host population change their economic activity. One suggests that Tanzanians adjusted to the presence of refugees by moving away from activities such as casual agricultural jobs, for which there was strong competition from refugees, and instead move to farming and raising their own livestock at home. [5] Tanzanians also took advantage of opportunities for government jobs in refugee-affected areas. [6]

It is clear that the closure of the Dadaab camps, if it finally occurs, will have serious negative consequences for the refugees. As we’ve seen, evidence suggests that the regional economy is also likely to suffer significantly. But the presence of the refugees has transformed the host communities and for them the overall economic benefits of the camps may be long lasting.

Carlos Vargas-Silva is a senior researcher at the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS) at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom, where he leads a project examining the impacts of forced migration on labour markets. He has also acted as a consultant on migration for the World Bank and UN University, among others. He can be contacted on Twitter: @CSil_Var

References

[1] Isabel Ruiz and Carlos Vargas-Silva The economics of forced migration (Journal of Development Studies, 27 April 2013)
 
[2] Alexander Betts and others Refugee economies: Rethinking popular assumptions (Humanitarian Innovation Project, June 2014)
 
[3] Martin Enghoff and others In search of protection and livelihoods: socio-economic and environmental impacts of Dadaab refugee camps on host communities (Danish Refugee Council, August 2010)
 
[4] Jean-François Maystadt and Gilles Duranton The development push of refugees: Evidence from Tanzania (International Food Policy Research Institute, October 2014)
 
[5] Isabel Ruiz and Carlos Vargas-Silva The labor market consequences of hosting refugees (Social Science Research Network, 20 April 2015)
 
[6] Isabel Ruiz and Carlos Vargas-Silva The labor market impacts of forced migration (Allied Social Science Association meetings, January 2015)

Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.