Knowledge adaptation key to local innovation, finds review

Local innovations in areas such as agriculture require translating available knowledge to home-grown needs Copyright: Flickr/Sida Sweden

Send to a friend

The details you provide on this page will not be used to send unsolicited email, and will not be sold to a 3rd party. See privacy policy.

The adaptation of scientific findings to local needs is key to improving the economic impact of research funding in developing countries, according to an independent evaluation of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency’s (SIDA) innovation programmes.

The bulk of innovations in poor countries are not immediately based on new research findings, but on local or small-scale innovations through activities such as reverse engineering or translating available knowledge to home-grown needs, says the report released last month.

The message for research funding agencies is that new research findings do not automatically lead to innovation and economic growth. Instead, what is required is a better understanding of — and support for — the linkages between the supply of new ideas from research, and the demand for those ideas by local economies.


  • Innovations in poor countries are not based on new findings, but on translation of existing knowledge
  • Support is needed to ensure that research leads to innovation, not just publications
  • Science aid should target problem-driven research and include budget for evaluation

The findings are based on ten research cooperation programmes SIDA funds with up to 200 million Swedish krona (around US$31 million) per project.

"Inclusive development through innovation that improves quality of life in developing countries is of great importance," says Ana Gren, research advisor at SIDA, who is leading a working group that is writing a SIDA position paper in response to the review.

Gren says that other international aid agencies might note the benefits of supporting high-quality scientific research geared towards promoting economic growth, and suggests they should be open to backing it.

The report highlights the importance of supporting innovation initiatives that link
government, universities and business to yield incremental innovations that increase economic productivity and build trust among people in developing countries.

Gren says these frameworks work well when research activities are initiated with local research partners, and when knowledge comes from local interests.

For example, a biotechnology project using a by-product of mushroom fermentation to treat waste water pollution links academic research to a way of targeting a major agricultural problem in Africa, she says.

Amitav Rath, leader of the evaluation team for the review and CEO of consultancy Policy Research International, says: "Global research should be married to local communities for maximum local development impact".

For example, a leather research and industry cluster has emerged in Bolivia in which local businesses have adopted traditional methods for treating leather, Gren says.

The report also calls for investment in problem-solving research.

Rath tells SciDev.Net that such research — as opposed to results published in journals — is an important part of increasing the productivity of specific sectors in developing countries.

"It is not enough to be in an ivory-towered world, hoping that somehow one’s enquiries will find application," Rath says. Instead, their application must be planned for from the beginning and sufficient resources provided, he says.

Another report recommendation is to spend more time and funding on evaluating ongoing projects.

Without evaluation, the different stakeholders cannot learn and adapt their responses as the work evolves, says Rath.

Because of this, he says, around three to five per cent of the overall budget of all research cooperation projects should be spent on evaluation.

He says that independent evaluation reports of aid projects not only prove to domestic taxpayers that their money is properly accounted for, but they can also highlight poorly designed or incorrectly framed initiatives.

Link to full report