We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Climate talks should focus on improving access to energy services, not cutting emissions, say Nancy Birdsall and Arvind Subramanian from the Center for Global Development.

International climate negotiations are stuck, partly because developed and developing countries are too busy playing 'blame games' to decide who should cut emissions and by how much.

But emissions are not the primary issue, say the authors. In the developing world, billions of people lack access to basic energy services. Making these people cut emissions would "push them from just above subsistence back to the dark ages", say the authors.

Climate talks should instead focus on improving access to energy in developing countries without adding to emissions. This requires revolutionary improvements in clean technology, say the authors.

Both developed and developing countries must put public funds into green energy research, which could go to guaranteeing a price for future products, as donors frequently do for new vaccines, or other ways of developing clean technologies.

A global intellectual property regime for clean energy that provides incentives for development while also allowing rapid dissemination must be agreed on.

A critical first step is for negotiators to move away from setting emissions reductions targets. Rich countries must drop demands that developing nations commit to emissions cuts. On the other hand, developing countries must adopt targets for emissions-intensity and international verification of these, which could inform technology transfer deals.

Link to full article in Financial Times