18/11/20

Mammal loss threatens Latin America ecosystem benefits

perdida mamiferos1
The jaguar is the Americas’ largest feline, reaching up to more than 100 kilograms and almost two meters long. Copyright: Joshua J. Cotten/Unsplash, (public domain image).

Speed read

  • Ecotourism, soil formation and disease control most affected by biodiversity loss
  • Larger mammal species more vulnerable to extinction
  • More than 40 per cent of ecosystem services provided by mammals already lost in Latin America

Send to a friend

The details you provide on this page will not be used to send unsolicited email, and will not be sold to a 3rd party. See privacy policy.

Mammal loss is accelerating across Latin America, threatening the delicate ecosystem balance that ultimately provides communities with food, shelter and livelihoods, new research warns.

The extinction or decline in the populations of mammals — particularly the largest of these animals — can have far-reaching consequences for the natural processes of ecosystems, such as seed dispersal, pollination and even oxygen production, a study published in Ecosystem Services journal warns.

‘Ecosystem services’ are the benefits that people and communities derive from the environment — clean air and water, food and materials, as well as cultural and spiritual services.

In-article banner ad for sdn plus

Researchers used data from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and a range of literature to examine the distribution of more than 1,000 mammal species across the Neotropical region. This region is one of the six major biogeographic areas of the world and extends across Central America, the Caribbean and South America.

“Losing southern muriquis and tapirs means altering the carbon stock systems of our biosphere, which means accelerating climate change and, ultimately, the collapse of our societies.”

Fabio Olmos, Latin America director, Permian Global

Modelling a scenario where all critically endangered species in Latin America died out, or where the populations of vulnerable mammals were halved, the study argues that the ecosystem services that would be most affected would include ecotourism, soil formation, disease control and protein acquisition by traditional peoples.

This could snowball into increasing species loss and greater impact on green areas, say the authors.
 

‘Empty forests’

Adriano Chiarello, an expert in Neotropical mammals and a professor of conservation biology at the University of São Paulo in Ribeirão Preto, says this scenario would be dangerous. He says ecosystems services provided by mammals are essential for the maintenance of native forests.

“Each species that dies signifies the loss of a symbiotic relationship with the forests, ultimately weakening their capacity for perpetuation. Forests are not just made of plants, but also of the animals that live within them,” Chiarello, who was not involved in the study, tells SciDev.Net.

The tapir is the largest mammal in South America and can reach up to 300 kilograms. This herbivore is an important seed disperser.
Copyright: schmeeve (CC BY-SA 2.0).
In either scenario, “we would have empty forests,” he says.

“Losing southern muriquis [a critically endangered primate] and tapirs means altering the carbon stock systems of our biosphere, which means accelerating climate change and, ultimately, the collapse of our societies,” says Fabio Olmos, a zoology expert and Latin America director for Permian Global, a firm focused on protection and recovery of tropical rainforest to mitigate climate change.

Seeds from large, ancient and dense trees — the main carbon sinks in tropical forests — are dispersed by the medium and large mammals that are most affected by hunting and human activities.

 


Study co-author Carlos Peres, from the universities of East Anglia in the United Kingdom and Paraíba in Brazil, says that animal protein is the most valuable forest resource for traditional peoples in the Amazon, “who don’t go to the supermarket for their monthly grocery shopping. They fish and hunt for their subsistence.”

If mammal species are lost, “locals lose their access to animal protein and will look for sources in other places,” says Peres.

“This could feed deforestation because the tendency is to slash forests to herd cattle — which can change a whole ecosystem and quicken climate change processes.”

Symbiosis

In another study published in Nature Scientific Reports in September, the same team found that Latin America has already lost about 60 per cent of its larger mammals (weighing more than one kilogram) in the past 500 years.

Larger species are more vulnerable to extinction because they reproduce more slowly, have a longer incubation time, fewer calves per birth and take longer to become adults. And, smaller species often depend on processes determined by larger ones.

“The white rhinoceros in Africa, for example, feed and step on grassy regions, flattening those areas — which are also home for antelopes, birds and small rodents,” says Olmos, who was not involved in the study.

“If the white rhinoceros disappears, these other species disappear too, since they depend on the rhino to transform the landscape in which they live.

“This research is not about losing fluffy and cute animals. It’s about losing a critical part of fundamental ecosystems.”

This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Latin America & Caribbean desk.

Both studies were supported by FAPESP, a SciDev.Net donor.
 

Trust-Logo-Stacked