We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Although it has yet to be officially announced, it is thought that UNESCO will dissolve its Earth sciences division.

Geoscientists say this would have dire consequences for the highly successful International Geoscience Programme, which has funded more than 500 international projects in the past 30 years (see UNESCO 'plans to cut funds for geoscience programme').

In this article in The Guardian, Jan Zalasiewicz argues that dissolving the Earth sciences division would have a major impact on the ability of the world's poorest nations to understand and manage their own resources.

Zalasiewicz says UNESCO's input into the budget of the International Geoscience Programme is to be cut by half. This, he says, would make it difficult for scientists from developing countries to get involved in long-term and significant projects. It would also severely reduce their chances of publishing research in top journals and of receiving any attention, funding or support for their work.

Zalasiewicz adds that Earth sciences is a still widely unexplored field and should not be considered less important than research on water or ecology. Closing UNESCO's earth sciences division at a time when there is a strong political will to improve conditions in poorer countries is particularly bad timing, he says.

Link to full article in The Guardian (United Kingdom)