We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

The tsunami of 26 December 2004 has left many questioning the value given to science in South Asia, and how well its results and predictions are being used.

In this editorial in Current Science, P. Balaram says that, in India, of all the scientific disciplines, earth sciences — including geophysics, geology, seismology, and atmospheric science — appear to offer the least professional appeal. Geology teaching, for instance, is often "dull, descriptive and untouched by the excitement of modern sciences", he writes.

He suspects the output of Indian earth sciences is limited in terms of both its quality and quantity, and calls for academic departments and courses in the field to be modernised.

Balaram bemoans the way politicians make statements in favour of boosting the sciences following natural disasters, when such statements are not generally matched by action.

Recalling his description of the "bleak" state of Indian earth sciences in the aftermath of the Bhuj earthquake in 2001, Balaram concludes that nothing has improved since then.

Link to full article in Current Science 

Link to SciDev.Net's news focus 'Tsunami update'