15/07/08

Scientists map potential Sichuan aftershock areas

The Sichuan earthquake killed nearly 70,000 people Copyright: Flickr/Feel Guilty Inc : Shu Di

By: Peng Kuang

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Scientists map potential Sichuan aftershock areas</h1>
<h4>By: Peng Kuang</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>[BEIJING] Scientists have mapped the areas most at risk of experiencing aftershocks from the Sichuan earthquake in China.</span></p>
<p><span>Aftershocks often occur, sometimes months or years after a large magnitude earthquake. The Sichuan quake on 12 May measured 7.9 on the Richter scale.</span></p>
<p><span>Tom Parsons from the US Geological Survey and colleagues from the University of California, Santa Barbara and Penn State University used a model called ‘stress-transfer analysis’ to map stress changes in the faults of the Sichuan basin. </span></p>
<p><span>According to their results, published in <em>Nature </em>on 6 July, Ya’an Thrust, Xiong Po Thrust, and Xianshuihe Fault, all near Longmen Fault where the earthquake occurred, show a notable increase in static stress changes, and therefore face a high risk of aftershocks. </span></p>
<p><span>"The 12 May earthquake … caused grievous losses, yet its legacy includes possible large aftershocks in the near future because it increased failure stress on important faults within and around the Sichuan basin," write the authors. </span></p>
<p><span>But Parsons told SciDev.Net that analysing static stress only looks at long-lasting changes. Earthquakes can also be triggered by shorter ‘dynamic stress changes’. These happen as the seismic waves from a mainshock pass through the Earth’s crust, which results in transient changes.</span></p>
<p><span>Qu Guosheng, chief engineer at China National Earthquake Response Support Service, says that the accuracy of such mapping depends on the quality of the model, rather than which type of stress is used to make the calculations.</span></p>
<p><span>"Different people have a different understanding of how to use past data to build an effective model to predict aftershocks," Qu Guosheng told SciDev.net.</span></p>
<p><span>To create an automatic forecast system to judge aftershocks using mainshock information, all the faults of the areas of interest need to be programed into a model. Researchers don’t always agree with each other’s models, explaining why aftershocks are not often predicted, adds Qu.</span></p>
<p><span>Parsons emphasises that we could only exactly pinpoint where and when the next earthquake would happen by knowing the total stress in the region and the threshold at which such stress causes an earthquake.</span></p>
<p><span>But knowing where earthquakes are more likely to happen could help in diaster management, the authors write.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature07177.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><span>Link to full paper in <em>Nature</em></span></a></span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/scientists-map-potential-sichuan-aftershock-areas/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/scientists-map-potential-sichuan-aftershock-areas/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

[BEIJING] Scientists have mapped the areas most at risk of experiencing aftershocks from the Sichuan earthquake in China.

Aftershocks often occur, sometimes months or years after a large magnitude earthquake. The Sichuan quake on 12 May measured 7.9 on the Richter scale.

Tom Parsons from the US Geological Survey and colleagues from the University of California, Santa Barbara and Penn State University used a model called ‘stress-transfer analysis’ to map stress changes in the faults of the Sichuan basin.

According to their results, published in Nature on 6 July, Ya’an Thrust, Xiong Po Thrust, and Xianshuihe Fault, all near Longmen Fault where the earthquake occurred, show a notable increase in static stress changes, and therefore face a high risk of aftershocks.

"The 12 May earthquake … caused grievous losses, yet its legacy includes possible large aftershocks in the near future because it increased failure stress on important faults within and around the Sichuan basin," write the authors.

But Parsons told SciDev.Net that analysing static stress only looks at long-lasting changes. Earthquakes can also be triggered by shorter ‘dynamic stress changes’. These happen as the seismic waves from a mainshock pass through the Earth’s crust, which results in transient changes.

Qu Guosheng, chief engineer at China National Earthquake Response Support Service, says that the accuracy of such mapping depends on the quality of the model, rather than which type of stress is used to make the calculations.

"Different people have a different understanding of how to use past data to build an effective model to predict aftershocks," Qu Guosheng told SciDev.net.

To create an automatic forecast system to judge aftershocks using mainshock information, all the faults of the areas of interest need to be programed into a model. Researchers don’t always agree with each other’s models, explaining why aftershocks are not often predicted, adds Qu.

Parsons emphasises that we could only exactly pinpoint where and when the next earthquake would happen by knowing the total stress in the region and the threshold at which such stress causes an earthquake.

But knowing where earthquakes are more likely to happen could help in diaster management, the authors write.

Link to full paper in Nature