Can ‘rice intensification’ feed the world?

Copyright: Ch. Errath/FAO

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Can ‘rice intensification’ feed the world?</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P>Rice feeds more than half the people in the world; but not well and not for much longer. As the population rises, so does the demand for rice, yet yields of the crop are levelling out, despite efforts on a variety of fronts, including genetic engineering of rice strains for improved nutrition and growth.</P><br />
<P>So it is no surprise that a simple method that claims to boost yields at lower cost to farmers is being hailed by many as a solution. The System of Rice Intensification (SRI), developed in the late 1980s in Madagascar works on three tenets: that seedlings should be transplanted quickly when young; that plants should be spaced widely apart; and that fields should be kept moist but not flooded.</P><br />
<P>But, as Christopher Surridge reports, although advocates of SRI routinely report yields of up to twice those achieved by conventional agriculture, many eminent agronomists dismiss such achievements as the result of poor record keeping and unscientific thinking.</P><br />
<P><a  href="http://www.nature.com/login/scidev_login.taf?ref=/nature/journal/v428/n6981/full/428360a_fs.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article in <EM>Nature</EM></A> </P>Reference: <em>Nature </em>428, 360 (2004)</p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/features/can-rice-intensification-feed-the-world/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/features/can-rice-intensification-feed-the-world/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

Rice feeds more than half the people in the world; but not well and not for much longer. As the population rises, so does the demand for rice, yet yields of the crop are levelling out, despite efforts on a variety of fronts, including genetic engineering of rice strains for improved nutrition and growth.

So it is no surprise that a simple method that claims to boost yields at lower cost to farmers is being hailed by many as a solution. The System of Rice Intensification (SRI), developed in the late 1980s in Madagascar works on three tenets: that seedlings should be transplanted quickly when young; that plants should be spaced widely apart; and that fields should be kept moist but not flooded.

But, as Christopher Surridge reports, although advocates of SRI routinely report yields of up to twice those achieved by conventional agriculture, many eminent agronomists dismiss such achievements as the result of poor record keeping and unscientific thinking.

Link to full article in Nature

Reference: Nature 428, 360 (2004)