We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

An attempt to galvanise UK universities to direct research at global health and neglected diseases while making their findings more available to people in developing countries is being launched next month.
An online index will grade UK universities according to the level and impact of their research on global health and neglected diseases.
It will also rank them according to how accessible their findings are to other researchers, particularly those in low- and middle-income countries. Users will be able to explore the various results and get information on how to use the index to advocate for change.
The project is a collaboration between Medsin-UK, a student global health network, and the UK branch of Universities Allied for Essential Medicines (UAEM), an international student-led NGO that calls for global health research and intellectual property reform at universities.

“The concept of neglected diseases is about the failure of the market to address public health needs when they predominantly or exclusively affect poor people.”

Rachel Cohen, DNDi

Dzintars Gotham, UAEM’s European coordinator, tells SciDev.Net he hopes the index will encourage universities to “change their research systems to make them more directed by global need”.
He adds: “We also hope universities will adopt concrete policies to both make their research accessible in terms of open-access publishing and ensure the drugs they develop are affordable in the developing world through socially responsible licensing policies.”
Gotham says that while UK universities do more neglected disease research than those in other countries, they must do more given the global burden of these diseases. He says there is no coherent commitment to this goal across all universities, so “we really want them to systematically embrace this”.
Gotham adds that universities are uniquely placed to tackle neglected disease research because they are free from a profit-driven mandate and so have “more flexibility to adopt globally minded strategies”.

He says UAEM’s North American ‘report card’ — the forerunner of the UK research index — has brought “concrete changes” to the American research landscape in global health.
“A number of socially responsible licensing policies were adopted, which means that the technologies they [US and Canadian universities] develop are made affordable in developing countries through contractual provisions,” he says.
Rachel Cohen, regional executive director for the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) in North America, tells SciDev.Net that “universities are among the most important non-profit research institutions on the planet”.
“The concept of neglected diseases is about the failure of the market to address public health needs when they predominantly or exclusively affect poor people”, and the failure of public policies to correct this imbalance, she says. The Ebola crisis is just one example of the “lack of effective treatments, diagnostics and vaccines for neglected diseases writ large,” she adds.
Cohen says universities could be a major part of the solution for neglected diseases.
“They could help dramatically turn the tide against neglected diseases by making serious commitments to innovation and to provisions in licensing agreements that will guarantee affordability and access for patients,” she says.
The UAEM Report Card concept is “so important” because it offers “the only comprehensive picture” of academic investment in neglected disease research, she says.
Gotham says that there are currently only plans to look at the research practice of “well-funded research universities” in the United Kingdom, although a team in Germany is also looking into replicating the project.