We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Preliminary results of a global project to assess earthquake risk are being presented at a meeting in the United States this week (3–4 June).

The Global Earthquake Model (GEM) — launched in 2006 and expected to be fully functional and freely available by 2013 — will calculate risks of loss of life based on the geology, building types and regulations in different regions of the world (see Global Earthquake Model merits support).

Eventually, local officials will be able to use GEM to upload local data and calculate risk for their areas.

Researchers say they developed computer programmes based on existing models that can quickly predict the risk of loss of human life as a result of earthquakes.

"We didn't think we'd get that far [during the pilot stage]," said Helen Crowley, a civil engineer at the European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering, Pavia, Italy.

But some critics said that it will be challenging to communicate these results to people most at risk. The project has so far not considered these end-users, said Brian Tucker, the founder of California-based non-profit organisation GeoHazards International.

Rui Pinho, GEM's secretary general, said he hoped the project would help bring safe construction rules to communities at risk in developing countries.

Link to article in Nature