Focus on Migration: The downside of polio vaccine checks

Polio vaccination_Flickr_Gate Foundation
Copyright: Flickr/Gates Foundation

Speed read

  • The WHO wants those leaving polio-hit nations to prove they are vaccinated
  • But mandating vaccination certificates could cause problems for migrants
  • Vaccination facilities for refugees could be one alternative solution

Send to a friend

The details you provide on this page will not be used to send unsolicited email, and will not be sold to a 3rd party. See privacy policy.

In response to the cross-border spread of polio in Asia and Africa during the typically low-transmission season of January-April, the WHO has called for a coordinated international response. A key recommendation is making polio-vaccination documents mandatory for anyone travelling out of ten countries in these regions where polio has been detected recently. [1]

The proposal is part of efforts to achieve the global goal of eradicating polio by 2018. But it would also be one more barrier for migrants — especially those fleeing armed conflict or human rights violations. These are not the ideal conditions under which to queue for a polio shot and get the paperwork done.

Failure to control the disease often reflects a failure of governance, sometimes as a result of political instability. For instance, although Syria was declared polio-free in 1999, it has reported 27 cases since a 2013 outbreak because the civil war led to a drastic cut in vaccination coverage. From there, the virus spread across the border to Iraq. Similarly, an outbreak in Pakistan spread to Afghanistan, and an outbreak in Cameroon has affected Equatorial Guinea.

All these countries are refugee origins or destinations. Other countries where the WHO found the poliovirus are Ethiopia, Israel, Nigeria and Somalia. [2]

“Although Syria was declared polio-free in 1999, it has reported 27 cases since a 2013 outbreak because the civil war led to a drastic cut in vaccination coverage.”

Max Martin

Getting a polio-vaccination certificate may be difficult amid conflict or other violence. And it is questionable whether a certificate issued to a desperate migrant in such a scenario will be genuine.

Requiring a certificate could also distort public perceptions and, by extension, policies — inadvertently encouraging migrants to be viewed as a potential health threat. Media reports in various parts of the world suggest that recently, especially in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, much hostility has been drummed up against migrants. In such a climate, a seemingly official tag of being a health threat is the last thing that a migrant or a refugee needs.

Travel restrictions do help in disease control, but only in conjunction with better interventions, such as access to high-quality vaccines, for people coming from or going to countries with polio.

And considering the practical issues involved in getting a vaccination certificate in countries that face difficult situations such as conflict, the WHO and other UN bodies should make it easier for migrants to get clearance to enter another country. Or they could explore alternative solutions, such as vaccination facilities for refugees and others forced to migrate. At the same time, UN agencies should work to counter the negative perceptions of migration that might come from such disease-control interventions.

Max Martin is a doctoral candidate at the University of Sussex, United Kingdom, researching on climate-related migration. The views expressed are his own.