We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

China is struggling to introduce a system to assess 'green GDP' — the economic cost of pollution, environmental damage and natural resource usage — reports Jane Qiu in this Nature article .

The green GDP scheme subtracts the environmental costs from the normal gross domestic product to help mitigate environmental problems and guide new development.

The government is accused of blocking an official report ranking all 31 provinces of China according to their green GDP, saying the accounting methodology is too crude for the findings to be meaningful.

But critics say the real reason is that some local governments have lobbied central government against the scheme.

Economic development has traditionally taken precedence over environmental concerns in China. Local officials are judged largely on their ability to increase economic growth, so green GDP could become a stumbling block to success.

There also remain technical hurdles to any green GDP scheme, such as taking into account all environmental damage and calculating the market value of environmental impact.

As one economist puts it, whether the report is released or not, "you don't need the numbers to tell you that environmental problems in China are worsening".

Link to full article in Nature