We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Warning Sign from Costa Rica's Environmental Service Payment Programme: "Hunting, Forest Fires and Forest Product Collection Prohibited"
The conservation community should shift its emphasis from indirect incentives for tropical biodiversity preservation to a system of direct conservation payments, advise Paul Ferraro and Agnes Kiss in this article.

Global efforts to conserve biodiversity in developing countries through indirect methods — such as encouraging sustainable use of resources or tying development of schools, wells or clinics to preservation — have provided few examples of success, they say.

Instead the authors advocate direct incentives such as those now common in the United States, Australia and Europe: land purchases and leases, as well as performance payments and tax relief. They argue that such systems can be simpler to administer, more cost-efficient, and more beneficial to the resource users.

Link to Science article

Photo credit: Subhrendu K. Pattanayak