Bringing science and development together through original news and analysis

  • Top controversies of 2012

SciDev.Net revisits some of the hottest controversies in science and development in 2012: scientists at loggerheads, flawed studies, missing data, forgery, angry neighbours, environmental experiments, magic mountains and toxic gold.

Which SciDev.Net articles do you find the most intriguing? Let us know by commenting below or tweeting us @scidevnet using #bestof2012

Critics have questioned the methods of a study claiming that the WHO has greatly underestimated the number of malaria fatalities.

India's Supreme Court has approved a multi-billion dollar plan to divert water from more than 30 Indian rivers to dry regions, angering the country's neighbours.

A study that claimed to boost cassava's protein content has been retracted after the research team found they could not repeat its results.

Thailand's academic credibility has been put in the spotlight again, with opinion divided over a government official's forgery conviction.

Opinion in Jordan is divided over the country's planned nuclear reactor and training centre, which protestors say jeopardises public safety.

Scientists are challenging a decision to allow small-scale to continue to use mercury to separate gold from other minerals.

The environmental threats posed by the world's first deep-sea mining project may have been poorly assessed, says a campaign group review.

Controversy has arisen over claims that mountain formations in Indonesia are manmade structures capable of withstanding earthquakes.

Plans to channel more than a billion cubic metres of water each year from the Red to the Dead Sea have been challenged by environmentalists.

A controversial science reform that gave the Venezuelan government more control over a private sector RD tax has boosted science funding.

See also: The most debated stories of 2012

Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.