Skip Navigation

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Peruvian region outlaws biopiracy

Zoraida Portillo

21 January 2009 | EN | ES

Women from the Potato Park, an initiative for six of Cusco's native communities, now benefit from the regional law.

Zoraida Portillo

[LIMA] A region of Peru is claiming to be the first in the world to enact a law outlawing biopiracy and protecting indigenous knowledge at a regional level.

Cusco — in the Peruvian Andes, once the capital of the Inca Empire — has outlawed the plundering of native species for commercial gain,including patenting resources or the genes they contain.

Corporations or scientists must now seek permission from, and potentially share benefits with, the local people whose traditions have protected the species for centuries.

Indigenous communities can now implement ways to protect local resources, including creating registers of biodiversity and protocols for granting access to it.

"I know of no other local or regional laws similar to this one that brings a legal framework for access to the genetic resources and traditional knowledge and practices — I think this is a significant precedent," said Michel Pimbert of the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development.

Local scientists and activists believe the law's value lies in the fact that for the first time a regional government will be empowered to challenge its national government on biopiracy.

"The new law is a good example of how local governments can create the appropriate legal and institutional framework, as well as the mechanisms to implement it, to ensure that biopiracy does not prey on the creativity of indigenous peoples and local communities," Alejandro Argumedo, director of Asociacion ANDES, a Cusco-based indigenous organisation, told SciDev.Net.

But while the law is an important precedent, it could come into conflict with national laws regarding the recording of indigenous knowledge, said María Scurrah, a Peruvian scientist specializing in farmer's rights.

The National Institute for the Protection of the Consumer and Intellectual Property has created a National Register of Indigenous Knowledge. But the Cusco law says that native communities of the region will make their own records and share them only according to certain rules.

"I believe that ancient knowledge should be kept by the community and be brought to a national registry to ensure payment to each community for each variety and species registered," said Scurrah. "That is the only way to pay for each community to be the guardian of biodiversity."

Pimbert said that the most significant aspect of the law is that it shows progress can be made at a regional level, rather than working through "central governments that have become increasingly distant and unaccountable to citizens in many countries throughout the world".

Comments (2)

huib ghijsen ( Belgium )

28 January 2009

Although this law seems a victory for the local indigenous people, reality and future will show it is not! It is a sad misconception that genetic resources for breeding purposes will deliver much benefit. Maybe in the case of medicines there will be some block busters to benefit from, but not in agriculture.

There are two main risks with this kind of developments:

1. The important so called ‘breeder’s exemption’ providing free access for further breeding to protected varieties under most Plant Breeder’s Rights laws may be jeopardized by creating complex, legally insecure and costly access mechanisms for the remaining, non-protected germplasm.

2. The big corporations, who have the knowledge and human resources benefit from the legal impedements on genetic resources; they know how to deal with them while it will harm the small and medium sized companies.

The best way to benefit from genetic resources is to create improved (local) varieties for the (local) farmers!!

Carol Thompson ( United States of America )

24 February 2009

This initiative does offer a major strength for resisting biopiracy in that it recognizes and empowers three levels of governance: local communities, national and regional. At any one level, bioresource treasures could be 'sold' for a pittance; three checking each other will increase transparency and awareness. See full analysis of FTAs and biopiracy, as well as alternatives of resistance, in Biopiracy of Biodiversity by Andrew Mushita (Zimbabwe) and Carol Thompson.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top

Information Services