Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
Flickr/cudmore
[BEIJING] A leading Chinese scientist has appealed for funding to make many Chinese journals open access and give priority to domestic science publications to boost the country's scientific journals.
"We can invest billions of yuan in big science projects, but we also need to invest a tiny 200 million yuan (US$29.4 million) in an open access fund to help the growth of our journals," said Zhu Zuoyan, the recently retired deputy head of the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) at a forum on journal development last week (27 August).
He says government-funded open access journals would be a breakthrough for science publishing in China.
Zhu said most international journals are commercially run, which leads them to publish relatively slowly to reduce editorial costs. Domestic journals can publish papers faster.
He added that open access journals prioritise academic merits over commercial interests. A government-funded open access initiative would reduce or eliminate the cost of publishing — enabling Chinese journals to attract more high-quality papers and improve their impact.
Zhu's remarks come amidst complaints that Chinese scientists are publishing more in overseas journals than domestic ones, which some say endangers the existence of the 5,000 scientific journals published in China.
In 2006, more than 80 per cent of Chinese physics papers published in journals listed in the Science Citation Index (SCI) — a global indicator evaluating the quality of journals — were published in international journals, according to a study by Wang Bingsheng, a leading physicist and editor of the journal Chinese Physics Letters, presented at the forum.
China's science institutions often evaluate the outputs of their scientists using the impact factors of the journals where they publish their papers. Many international journals have higher impact factors than Chinese ones.
Shi Yigong, a professor of biology at Tsinghua University in Beijing, told SciDev.Net that even if Chinese scientists are patriotic enough to publish domestically, many university authorities remain keen on them publishing in international journals with higher impact factors.
But although most international journals have higher impact factors, Wang's study indicates that the quality of Chinese journals is not necessarily lower.
Wang found that each of the Chinese physics papers published in the five SCI-categorised Chinese physics journals has been cited an average of two times while those published in international journals had 1.8 citations.
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.
Comments
Peter Matthews ( The Research Cooperative | Japan )
7 September 2008
Stevan Harnad ( Université du Québec à Montréal | Canada )
8 September 2008
===================================
The purpose of Open Access (OA) is to make research freely accessible online to all would-be users, not just those who can afford to subscribe to the journal in wich they were published. And the reason OA is beneficial to research, researchers, and the society that supports the research, is that it maximizes the accessibility, uptake, usage, applications and impact of research.
The benefits of OA should be provided for Chinese research, whether it is published in Chinese journals or international journals.
And the cheapest, fastest and surest way to provide OA to all of Chinese published research output is by self-archiving it in the OA institutional repositories of the institutions that produced the research. This is Green OA self-archiving, and it applies equally to research published in Chinese journals and international journals.
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/136-guid.html
It is a great strategic and practical mistake to imagine that converting Chinese journals to Gold OA is either the fullest or the fastest means of providing OA to Chinese research. Gold OA is welcome too, but it is Green OA self-archiving that urgently needs to be mandated by all research institutions and funders.
http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/
Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html