30/05/08

Brazil says yes to stem cell research — again

Human embryonic stem cells Copyright: PLoS Biology

By: Luisa Massarani

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Brazil says yes to stem cell research — again</h1>
<h4>By: Luisa Massarani</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court voted by a narrow margin to uphold legislation allowing research on embryonic stem cells yesterday (29 May), after almost three years of deadlock. </span></p>
<p><span>Research using embryonic stem cells is permitted under the country’s Biosafety Legislation, approved in March 2005, although several limitations are applied, such as only using embryos created by <em>in vitro </em>fertilization — and frozen for three years — that would be discarded anyway (see <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/news/brazil-says-yes-to-gm-crops-and-stem-cell-resear.html"><span>Brazil says ‘yes’ to GM crops and stem cell research</span></a>). </span></p>
<p><span>The research has remained controversial however — particularly with religious and anti-abortion groups — as the process involves removing stem cells from embryos at a few days old, which destroys them. </span></p>
<p><span>The 2005 decision was contested in the same year by Brazil’s then attorney general, Claudio Fonteles, who said that the legislation was against the right to life and human dignity, and therefore unconstitutional (see <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/news/legality-of-stem-cell-research-challenged-in-brazi.html"><span>Legality of stem cell research challenged in Brazil</span></a>).</span></p>
<p><span>The ministers of the supreme court began discussing Fonteles’s petition in March this year. But voting was interrupted at the request of the minister Carlos Alberto Direito, who wanted more time to evaluate the case. </span></p>
<p><span>Two days of intense debate resulted in a final tally of six out of 11 votes in favour of upholding the 2005 approval, with no amendments. The remaining five ministers voted to uphold the basic legislation but with restrictions. </span></p>
<p><span>The main concern raised was the need to control scientific studies. The minister Cezar Peluzo highlighted the importance of having a system for evaluating and approving requests on embryonic stem cell studies, such as an ethics commission.</span></p>
<p><span>"It’s key to impose conditions for the research activities," affirmed the minister Ricardo Lewandowski during the voting.</span></p>
<p><span>Scientists, patient groups and the minister of health, José Gomes Temporão, celebrated the decision.</span></p>
<p><span>"The decision is a victory for life, since it meets the expectations of thousands of patients who have hope for curing their diseases. The research on stem cells opens several possibilities for finding answers for diseases that currently have no treatments. The result allows Brazilian science to take a new position in the international scenario," said Temporão in a statement.</span></p>
<p><span>The National Conference of the Bishops of Brazil (CNBB) "regretted" the decision. </span></p>
<p><span>"The decision in the Supreme Court exhibited a significant divergence on the issue, showing that there are ministers who have ethical positions similar to the CNBB. That is, it is not about religious matters, but about promotion and defense of human life", says a statement distributed by CNBB.</span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/brazil-says-yes-to-stem-cell-research-again/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/brazil-says-yes-to-stem-cell-research-again/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court voted by a narrow margin to uphold legislation allowing research on embryonic stem cells yesterday (29 May), after almost three years of deadlock.

Research using embryonic stem cells is permitted under the country’s Biosafety Legislation, approved in March 2005, although several limitations are applied, such as only using embryos created by in vitro fertilization — and frozen for three years — that would be discarded anyway (see Brazil says ‘yes’ to GM crops and stem cell research).

The research has remained controversial however — particularly with religious and anti-abortion groups — as the process involves removing stem cells from embryos at a few days old, which destroys them.

The 2005 decision was contested in the same year by Brazil’s then attorney general, Claudio Fonteles, who said that the legislation was against the right to life and human dignity, and therefore unconstitutional (see Legality of stem cell research challenged in Brazil).

The ministers of the supreme court began discussing Fonteles’s petition in March this year. But voting was interrupted at the request of the minister Carlos Alberto Direito, who wanted more time to evaluate the case.

Two days of intense debate resulted in a final tally of six out of 11 votes in favour of upholding the 2005 approval, with no amendments. The remaining five ministers voted to uphold the basic legislation but with restrictions.

The main concern raised was the need to control scientific studies. The minister Cezar Peluzo highlighted the importance of having a system for evaluating and approving requests on embryonic stem cell studies, such as an ethics commission.

"It’s key to impose conditions for the research activities," affirmed the minister Ricardo Lewandowski during the voting.

Scientists, patient groups and the minister of health, José Gomes Temporão, celebrated the decision.

"The decision is a victory for life, since it meets the expectations of thousands of patients who have hope for curing their diseases. The research on stem cells opens several possibilities for finding answers for diseases that currently have no treatments. The result allows Brazilian science to take a new position in the international scenario," said Temporão in a statement.

The National Conference of the Bishops of Brazil (CNBB) "regretted" the decision.

"The decision in the Supreme Court exhibited a significant divergence on the issue, showing that there are ministers who have ethical positions similar to the CNBB. That is, it is not about religious matters, but about promotion and defense of human life", says a statement distributed by CNBB.