We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

How robust are rainforests against slash-and-burn clearance? A recent study claims that they are highly resilient, citing prehistoric evidence for the regeneration of forests after widespread disruption by humans (see History shows fragile forest to be a myth)

In these two letters to Science, researchers dispute the significance of this finding. Clive Hambler of the University of Oxford’s zoology department counters the notion, saying that the rainforests we see now could be substantially impoverished, and that the study could mislead policy makers and derail conservation efforts.

Bruce Beehler and colleagues at the Melanesia Centre for Biodiversity Conservation in Washington DC, United States, say that in many regions, wood extraction techniques are devastating forests, making regeneration virtually impossible. The authors add, however, that the activities of many subsistence forest communities are beneficial, and set them apart as forest stewards. 

Link to full letters by Hambler and by Beehler et al in Science

Reference: Science 305, 943 (2004)

Related topics