We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

[HANOI] A new study offers fresh estimates of the economic and social impacts of dengue fever in South-East Asia and one country in South Asia. But an expert on the disease says that the actual figures could be higher, as data is limited by a lack of reporting of cases by health officials in the countries studied and the limited resources put into surveillance.

The two-part study, published last month (21 February) in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, estimates that there are 2.9 million annual dengue infections and nearly 6,000 deaths across an area spanning Bhutan, East Timor and all ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

Dengue's annual disease burden is about 370 disability adjusted life years for every million inhabitants of South-East Asia, which translates as a cost of US$1.65 per person, the study reports.


  • Dengue costs South-East Asia US$1.65 a year per person
  • But the study 'grossly underestimates' the disease's burden in the region, says expert
  • The main limitation is the lack of surveillance data, he says

Its economic and disease burden is higher than those of hepatitis B, Japanese encephalitis and 15 other conditions, the study says.

Even so, Duane Gubler, founding director of the Emerging Infectious Diseases programme at Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, a collaboration between Duke University in the United States and the National University of Singapore, says the research "grossly underestimates" dengue's disease burden in the region.

The biggest limitation is the poor surveillance data the researchers had to work with, he tells SciDev.Net.

Gubler says that part of the problem is that countries in South-East Asia rely too much on international donors to fund dengue research projects, which breeds dependence.

"If we're ever going to control a disease like this, we need investment by the countries themselves," he says.

Eduardo A. Undurraga, a graduate student at Brandeis University, United States, and a co-author of both studies, acknowledges this limitation, and highlights several others.

For example, he says, the study did not measure people who are turned away from hospitals during dengue epidemics or those who die from other conditions after catching dengue.

There are also the economic costs caused by tourists deciding against travelling to a particular country because of concerns about catching dengue, he adds.

"If I know Thailand has a serious dengue outbreak, I would think twice about going there," Undurraga says, by way of offering a hypothetical example.

Most of the 50 million people infected by dengue fever each year live in developing countries in the tropics and subtropics.

Gubler says that dengue receives comparatively little attention from international donors and governments relative to HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and other high-profile diseases. Part of the reason, he suggests, is that it has comparatively lower fatality rates.

There is no specific treatment for the disease, but the French company Sanofi Pasteur has said it plans to launch the world’s first dengue vaccine by 2015.

This article has been produced by SciDev.Net's South-East Asia & Pacific desk.

Link to the first paper

Link to the second paper


PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002055 (2013)

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002056 (2013)

Related topics