We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Experience shows that policies tend to be more successful when they are based on research findings. But policymakers often disregard the research reports they are given or simply fail to read them.

In this article, Evelyn Kiapi Matsamura reports on efforts to find out what makes policymakers ignore some research reports and take others into account.

Among the problems are a lack of capacity for linking research and policy, and that policymakers do not always trust research findings. Presentation is a factor, as research reports can be large documents full of jargon and statistics that are difficult to understand.

Researchers and policymakers can also have quite different priorities. But policymakers' failure to take account of research can have serious consequences, as in the case of some countries' response to the AIDS pandemic.

Link to full Inter Press Service News Agency article