We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

In recent years, 'sound science' has been increasingly used to justify policy decisions on a variety of issues, ranging from climate change to nuclear waste and arsenic in water.

In this article, Sunita Narain, director of the India-based Centre for Science and Environment, argues that the term is being abused, and that questioning the scientific basis of issues has become the weapon of government and industry to protect their interests.

Narain argues that the Indian scientific establishment must engage more in public concerns. And, she argues, we should accept that science is not the ultimate truth, and that scientific uncertainty can never be completely eliminated. Science must guide policy, she says, but, ultimately, societal values and ethics must underwrite that policy code.

Link to full opinion article in Down to Earth

Related topics