We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Researchers' preference for publishing in globally recognised journals is skewing the direction of scientific inquiry away from local research, writes Priya Shetty in New Scientist.

In areas such as healthcare, agriculture and the environment it leads them to prioritise global research that may not meet the needs of individual countries.

The problem stems from the vicious circle in which local developing country journals find themselves trapped: because researchers see little value in publishing in them, they lack the high-quality papers required to attract authors.

One solution is for universities to give additional recognition to researchers who choose to publish their research locally. Additionally, donors should invest in local journals to compensate the lack of revenue from subscriptions.

Shetty says that online publishing is the way forward, citing the development of the open-access movement in the North as an example of how this can be achieved.

Developing countries are beginning to take ownership of the research they undertake. Now they must start to take control of where that research is published," she says.

Link to full article in New Scientist