We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Researchers in developing nations are encouraged to publish their results in 'high-brow' international journals. But are these journals the appropriate forum for discussing local public health and policy issues?

Samer Jabbour says there is an urgent need for strong local and regional journals. International agencies working with regional partners can help with this, he says, though not without a push from local scientists and medical doctors.

The problem, says Jabbour, is not a lack of excellent researchers to join editorial boards. Journals also need competent and accountable management, production and marketing teams. And there needs to be less pressure to have everything published in journals from the United States and Europe.

Link to full article in British Medical Journal

Reference: British Medical Journal 329, 299 (2004)