We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

A heated controversy involving an indigenous South American people and the most prominent anthropology body in the United States took a new twist last week. An anthropologist accused of misrepresenting the Yanomamö Indians of Venezuela is at the centre of the storm.

Last week, members of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) voted to reject a report by an AAA task force that had looked into charges levelled against the anthropologist. While exonerating him of the most serious charges, this report had argued that his representation of the Yanomamö was "damaging" to them.

Few, however, expect a ceasefire in the Yanomamö wars. A documentary on the affair is scheduled for broadcast in 2006, and some feel that the AAA should continue to monitor the charges. Others say that the field of anthropology itself is split between people trying to do science, and those who believe science has no place in the study of indigenous cultures.

Link to full article in Science