Big increase in Chinese science publishing reported

Copyright: WHO/TDR/Crump

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Big increase in Chinese science publishing reported</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P>China’s scientific output is increasing in line with its rapid economic growth. But while some fields of study are growing others are lagging behind. According to <em>Science Watch</em>, which tracks trends in publishing, the number of Chinese publications in international journals increased 20-fold between 1981 and 2003.</P><br />
<P>While five per cent of all science publications now come from China, the figure is higher for materials science (ten per cent) and mathematics and physics (both eight per cent). But China still lags behind in the life sciences, producing just 0.8 per cent of immunology papers and two per cent of publications in plant sciences.</P><br />
<P>Chinese papers published in certain fields, including physics, chemistry and geosciences, still have low average ‘impact factors’ — a measure of their influence on research done elsewhere in the same field. One Chinese researcher suggests his compatriots have strong technical and analytical skills but may be weaker at interpreting findings.</P><br />
<P><a  href="http://www.nature.com/login/scidev_login.taf?ref=/nature/journal/v431/n7005/full/431116b_fs.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full news story in <EM>Nature</EM></A></P><br />
<P>Reference: <em>Nature </em>431, 116 (2004)</P></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/big-increase-in-chinese-science-publishing-reporte/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/big-increase-in-chinese-science-publishing-reporte/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

China’s scientific output is increasing in line with its rapid economic growth. But while some fields of study are growing others are lagging behind. According to Science Watch, which tracks trends in publishing, the number of Chinese publications in international journals increased 20-fold between 1981 and 2003.

While five per cent of all science publications now come from China, the figure is higher for materials science (ten per cent) and mathematics and physics (both eight per cent). But China still lags behind in the life sciences, producing just 0.8 per cent of immunology papers and two per cent of publications in plant sciences.

Chinese papers published in certain fields, including physics, chemistry and geosciences, still have low average ‘impact factors’ — a measure of their influence on research done elsewhere in the same field. One Chinese researcher suggests his compatriots have strong technical and analytical skills but may be weaker at interpreting findings.

Link to full news story in Nature

Reference: Nature 431, 116 (2004)