By: Ari Patrinos and Dan Drell


We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Arguments about access to published data reached a peak of intensity when the draft sequence of the human genome was published in February last year, and resurfaced in April this year, when the draft rice genome was published (see Scientists crack rice code).

The controversy centred around the fact that journals have published genome maps without requiring the authors to place the supporting sequence data in public databases.

In this opinion article, Ari Patrinos and Dan Drell of the US Department of Energy argue that policies on release of biological data should reflect reality, to the benefit of all.

They suggest a variety of ways forward and say that the academic community must open itself up to new approaches, "bereft of fundamentalism regarding access to [private sector] data that governments did not fund and cannot claim to own".

Reference: Nature 417, 589 (2002)

Link to full text