02/02/10

Glaxo sets example to other drug companies

Copyright: Flickr/erix!

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Glaxo sets example to other drug companies</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<div>
<p><span>Pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has set an example to other drug companies by making its database of potential malaria drugs public, says a<em> Nature</em> editorial. </span></p>
<p><span>The move last month (January), provides access to data on 13,500 malaria drug candidates and marks an unprecedented open attitude to data sharing from big pharma (see <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/news/glaxo-to-share-malaria-drug-data.html">Glaxo to share malaria drug data</a>).</span></p>
<p><span>The editorial applauds GSK’s chief executive, Andrew Witty, for showing leadership in this attempt to re-engage with the neglected diseases that primarily affect developing countries. It suggests that more drug companies should embrace a similar attitude towards these diseases, as they present a "low risk area" for experimenting with open data.</span></p>
<p><span>Other institutions also have a role to play, argues the editorial. </span></p>
<p><span>Academic organisations must provide the infrastructure for archiving open data, and universities should support research that can develop drug leads such as those presented by GSK. </span></p>
<p><span>And both should be more open. The editorial accuses academics and their institutions of being among the "worst offenders" in terms of "hogging intellectual property", and concludes by suggesting they follow GSK’s lead and allow royalty-free use of technologies for good causes.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7280/full/463401a.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article in <em>Nature</em></a></span></p>
</div>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/glaxo-sets-example-to-other-drug-companies/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/glaxo-sets-example-to-other-drug-companies/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

Pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has set an example to other drug companies by making its database of potential malaria drugs public, says a Nature editorial.

The move last month (January), provides access to data on 13,500 malaria drug candidates and marks an unprecedented open attitude to data sharing from big pharma (see Glaxo to share malaria drug data).

The editorial applauds GSK’s chief executive, Andrew Witty, for showing leadership in this attempt to re-engage with the neglected diseases that primarily affect developing countries. It suggests that more drug companies should embrace a similar attitude towards these diseases, as they present a "low risk area" for experimenting with open data.

Other institutions also have a role to play, argues the editorial.

Academic organisations must provide the infrastructure for archiving open data, and universities should support research that can develop drug leads such as those presented by GSK.

And both should be more open. The editorial accuses academics and their institutions of being among the "worst offenders" in terms of "hogging intellectual property", and concludes by suggesting they follow GSK’s lead and allow royalty-free use of technologies for good causes.

Link to full article in Nature