27/11/03

Filling the gap between knowing and doing

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Filling the gap between knowing and doing</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P>Last month, an editorial in <em>Nature</em> urged the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund more upstream areas of basic research (see <a  href="/" target=_self rel="noopener noreferrer">Time for Gates to speak up about neglected diseases</A>)</P><br />
<P>But in this letter to <em>Nature</em>, Tikki Pang, director of the World Health Organisation’s research policy and cooperation department, argues that such a recommendation is off the mark, and that too much emphasis has been placed on biomedical and upstream basic research. Rather, he argues that most effort needs to be channelled into closing the gulf between what we know and what we do in practice — the ‘know-do’ gap.</P><br />
<P>Research into public-health systems and services and the contribution of the social and behavioural sciences are neglected fields, he says. Such research is critical in linking basic research to healthcare delivery, and in obtaining the participation and support of the people at whom new interventions are targeted.</P><br />
<P></P><br />
<P><a  href="http://www.nature.com/login/scidev_login.taf?ref=/nature/journal/v426/n6965/full/426383a_fs.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full letter in <EM>Nature</EM></A> </P>Reference: <em>Nature</em> 426, 383 (2003)</p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/filling-the-gap-between-knowing-and-doing/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/filling-the-gap-between-knowing-and-doing/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

Last month, an editorial in Nature urged the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund more upstream areas of basic research (see Time for Gates to speak up about neglected diseases)

But in this letter to Nature, Tikki Pang, director of the World Health Organisation’s research policy and cooperation department, argues that such a recommendation is off the mark, and that too much emphasis has been placed on biomedical and upstream basic research. Rather, he argues that most effort needs to be channelled into closing the gulf between what we know and what we do in practice — the ‘know-do’ gap.

Research into public-health systems and services and the contribution of the social and behavioural sciences are neglected fields, he says. Such research is critical in linking basic research to healthcare delivery, and in obtaining the participation and support of the people at whom new interventions are targeted.

Link to full letter in Nature

Reference: Nature 426, 383 (2003)