We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Researchers from India and the United Kingdom have developed an inexpensive surveillance system for measuring maternal mortality, which could eventually guide policymakers in protecting maternal health.


Conventional surveillance of maternal deaths is expensive and logistically challenging, write the researchers. Under-reporting is also frequent, particularly in India's remote rural areas, where maternal mortality is increased. As a result, policy decisions are made on inadequate evidence.


About two-thirds of Indian maternal deaths occur in just nine states. The study looked at two of those — Jharkhand and Orissa in eastern India — with a combined population of 228,186.


In their surveillance system, the researchers recruited key local informants —mostly traditional birth attendants — to record all births and stillbirths, and deaths of women of reproductive age (15–49 years).


By asking the causes of death from relatives of women who had died, deaths were classed as maternal, pregnancy-related or late maternal. Doctors then verified causes of death by examining the verbal autopsies.


A maternal mortality ratio of 722 per 100,000 live births was found. And the cost of the system was just US$0.02 per person per year, the researchers noted.


"The new method appears to be robust," said Prasanta Tripathy, an author of the study who is affiliated to Ekjut, an India-based nongovernmental organisation. "We always need to stress the difference between estimating — as most people do —and measuring, which is what we did," he told SciDev.Net.


"While maternal-mortality ratio in developing countries is mostly measured retrospectively, this method measured it prospectively through proper identification of live births and maternal deaths," said Sudip Saha, associate professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at the Calcutta Medical College Hospital, India. "The method is relatively easy and low-cost and helps avoid missing maternal deaths."


The authors write that the method could be used to monitor trends in maternal mortality and test the effect of interventions aiming to enhance maternal health.


The research was published in the journal BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 



Link to full paper in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth





BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth doi 10.1186/1471-2393-8-6 (2008)


Related topics