We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) is under fire from AIDS researchers over a series of publications on its website. The postings — many of which are on the journal's 'Rapid Response' section — make up a steady stream of unreviewed articles from people who deny that HIV causes AIDS.

The disproportionate prominence of this discussion compared with other AIDS issues is angering some researchers. They complain that the credibility conferred on Rapid Responses by the BMJ label may mislead policy makers and members of the public over the debate.

Richard Smith, editor of the BMJ, admits that a problem of unmoderated forums is that one side of an argument can "lose by attrition" to a more vocal minority. But Smith also cherishes the principle of Rapid Responses, which is based on free speech.

Link to full Nature article 

Reference: Nature 426, 215 (2003)