23/04/03

Biology’s last taboo

By: Jonathan Knight

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Biology’s last taboo</h1>
<h4>By: Jonathan Knight</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p>When the world’s first transgenic primate was created in early 2001, some reports suggested that we were just one step removed from ‘designer’ human babies. <BR><BR>But, in fact, technical complications mean that safe methods of manipulating the human germline are far from a practical reality.<BR><BR>And even if safety issues are overcome, the ethical questions remain unanswered. While some see altering the human genome as a legitimate way to cure inherited diseases, others believe that tampering with our genetic inheritance in this way is fundamentally wrong.<BR><BR>Reference: <em>Nature</em> 413, 12 (2001)<BR><BR><a href="http://www.nature.com/login/scidev_login.taf?ref=/nature/journal/v413/n6851/full/413012a0_fs.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full text</A><BR></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/features/biologys-last-taboo/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/features/biologys-last-taboo/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

When the world’s first transgenic primate was created in early 2001, some reports suggested that we were just one step removed from ‘designer’ human babies.

But, in fact, technical complications mean that safe methods of manipulating the human germline are far from a practical reality.

And even if safety issues are overcome, the ethical questions remain unanswered. While some see altering the human genome as a legitimate way to cure inherited diseases, others believe that tampering with our genetic inheritance in this way is fundamentally wrong.

Reference: Nature 413, 12 (2001)

Link to full text