We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

With millions more to feed in the decades to come, gearing agriculture up to cope is top priority for poorer nations. Scientists in the West are running to keep up – but how are they faring?

In this article, Science Editor-in-Chief Donald Kennedy reveals both good news and bad. On the positive side, the World Bank and other big donor agencies have been galvanised into action: the Global Conservation Trust, for instance, has gathered US$100 million to support conservation of valuable genetic resources. Less happily, the ongoing furore over GM crops and an intellectual property regime bristling with patents are impeding much progress in combating world hunger.

A balancing of costs and benefits is called for. GM technology may be controversial, but it remains perhaps the best choice for farmers forced onto marginal lands – and as the West debates, the poor starve.

Link to editorial in Science

Reference: Science, 302, 357 (2003)  

Related topics