14/01/09

Mangroves ‘do not protect against tsunamis’

Mangrove forest in India Copyright: Flickr/bbjee

By: Papri Sri Raman

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Mangroves ‘do not protect against tsunamis’</h1>
<h4>By: Papri Sri Raman</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>[CHENNAI] Claims that coastal forests can protect communities from the impact of tsunamis have been dismissed in a new report.</span></p>
<p><span>Researchers analysed the pattern of damage that occurred during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and say that there is no compelling evidence that coastal forests — such as mangroves — can act as ‘bioshields’ to adequately protect against tsunamis or cyclone storm surges.</span> The full report is soon to be published by the UN Environment Programme.</p>
<p><span>They go on to say that it would be "extremely dangerous" to rely on tree-planting alone to protect coastal communities.</span></p>
<p><span>Other factors, such as the height of a village above sea level and its distance from the shore need to be incorporated into an extensive, statistically sound analysis of which factors determine the impact of tsunamis.</span></p>
<p><span>Following the 2004 tsunami, studies claimed there was less damage to communities where there was a tree or vegetation barrier. Naluvedapathy — a coastal village in the state of Tamil Nadu — hit the headlines as a village that was saved by its bank of 60,000 casuarina and eucalyptus trees.</span></p>
<p><span>Bioshields have now become part of India’s National Disaster Management Plan and official policy, and many organisations have established programmes in the country. </span></p>
<p><span>In 2005, 254,464 trees were planted in a single day in Vedaranyam, Tamil Nadu, and state forest departments have been funded by the World Bank’s Emergency Tsunami Reconstruction Project to plant trees.</span></p>
<p><span>The M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) has also spent more than six million Indian rupees (about US$120,000) on bioshield research.</span></p>
<p><span>"Increasing green cover in any area is not waste of money … [The study] needs to be ignored," V. Selvam, programme director of Coastal Systems Research at MSSRF, told SciDev.Net.</span></p>
<p><span>"Enough field-based and laboratory-oriented studies have been conducted to provide proof that bioshields can mitigate the impact of tsunamis. This conclusion is accepted by many global organisations," he said.</span></p>
<p><span>But Andrew Baird of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and James Cook University, Australia, who led the study, says in a press release: "In my own visits to the tsunami-ravaged areas, I saw places where quite heavy vegetation had provided absolutely no protection at all against the force of the ocean."</span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/mangroves-do-not-protect-against-tsunamis/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/mangroves-do-not-protect-against-tsunamis/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

[CHENNAI] Claims that coastal forests can protect communities from the impact of tsunamis have been dismissed in a new report.

Researchers analysed the pattern of damage that occurred during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and say that there is no compelling evidence that coastal forests — such as mangroves — can act as ‘bioshields’ to adequately protect against tsunamis or cyclone storm surges. The full report is soon to be published by the UN Environment Programme.

They go on to say that it would be "extremely dangerous" to rely on tree-planting alone to protect coastal communities.

Other factors, such as the height of a village above sea level and its distance from the shore need to be incorporated into an extensive, statistically sound analysis of which factors determine the impact of tsunamis.

Following the 2004 tsunami, studies claimed there was less damage to communities where there was a tree or vegetation barrier. Naluvedapathy — a coastal village in the state of Tamil Nadu — hit the headlines as a village that was saved by its bank of 60,000 casuarina and eucalyptus trees.

Bioshields have now become part of India’s National Disaster Management Plan and official policy, and many organisations have established programmes in the country.

In 2005, 254,464 trees were planted in a single day in Vedaranyam, Tamil Nadu, and state forest departments have been funded by the World Bank’s Emergency Tsunami Reconstruction Project to plant trees.

The M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) has also spent more than six million Indian rupees (about US$120,000) on bioshield research.

"Increasing green cover in any area is not waste of money … [The study] needs to be ignored," V. Selvam, programme director of Coastal Systems Research at MSSRF, told SciDev.Net.

"Enough field-based and laboratory-oriented studies have been conducted to provide proof that bioshields can mitigate the impact of tsunamis. This conclusion is accepted by many global organisations," he said.

But Andrew Baird of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and James Cook University, Australia, who led the study, says in a press release: "In my own visits to the tsunami-ravaged areas, I saw places where quite heavy vegetation had provided absolutely no protection at all against the force of the ocean."