We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Environmentalists may remember 2003 as the year in which the Kyoto protocol on climate change died. At a major climate change meeting in Milan, Italy, last week, all eyes were on Russia, whose ratification of the treaty would bring it into force.

But high-level advisors to the Russian government said that the country would not ratify the protocol, at least in its current form, because it would stifle Russia’s economic growth.

In this article, Quirin Schiermeier reports that, even if the international community’s first attempt at tackling climate change is in terminal decline, many of the individual commitments thrashed out during the Kyoto negotiations might still live on. But it remains unclear whether such initiatives will have a significant impact on the world’s climate.

Link to full article in Nature 

Reference: Nature 426, 756 (2003)