Scientists rebuke Argentinean presidential candidates
- Science forum sends questionnaire on science policy to candidates
- Those who responded aim to raise science budget to one per cent of GDP
- But they offer no precise plans on how to achieve this
Last month, the Argentinean Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Information Forum (Politica SCTI) invited all candidates to answer a list of questions on their plans for science policy. Only three of the six candidates now up for election on 25 October replied and they did little more than say that science is important, say forum members.
“To various degrees, every candidate just supported what the government has done in the last decade.”
Luis Alberto Quesada Allué, Leloir Institute Foundation of CONICET
“The candidates did not speak about the regression the country has suffered in science and technology, despite the increasing spending on all kinds of other things,” says Luis Alberto Quesada Allué, a researcher at life science research centre the Leloir Institute Foundation of CONICET, Argentina’s main public research organisation. “To various degrees, every candidate just supported what the government has done in the last decade.”
The responses came from Daniel Scioli from the ruling Peronist alliance, Mauricio Macri from the centre-right Cambiemos coalition and Margarita Stolbizer from the broadly left-wing Progresistas coalition.
Scioli won over 38 per cent of votes in the primary election on 9 August, making him the favourite for next month’s poll.
In response to Politica SCTI’s questions, all three candidates said that, if elected, they would aim to increase the public science budget from 0.65 to one per cent of GDP (gross domestic product). They said this would be achieved by rejigging the country’s household spending, but offered no detailed plans for how to achieve this.
Regarding questions around which scientific fields should receive extra support, Scioli mentioned energy, mining, food production and software. Macri highlighted energy too, but also focused on airspace, biopharmaceutical products, satellite technology and genetic engineering.
Stolbizer pointed to about 30 government-funded projects on medicine, recycling, satellite design, nuclear power and wind power that needed further support. But Roberto Etchenique, a neuroscientist at the University of Buenos Aires, says the candidates failed to address a major problem: how to transfer new knowledge to society and businesses. Etchenique says more funding is needed to turn research results into innovation.
“This is the actual knowledge debt, and most of this debt is affecting the country’s business class, which is not accustomed to investing in innovation,” he says.
This article was produced by SciDev.Net’s Latin America and the Caribbean edition.