We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

The scientific community must do more to include indigenous people in genomics research to ensure that the benefits of this work are shared by all, says Vanessa M. Hayes.

A history of exploitation of indigenous populations in the name of scientific progress — such as unethical nuclear weapons testing in Aboriginal-occupied Australia or the 'biopiracy' of traditional knowledge — has created distrust in scientific research, says Hayes. This means that scientists must address communities' concerns before planning their research.

By including indigenous communities early on in the process they can help local people understand the consequences of participation in genomics research, argues Hayes.

Early involvement can also encourage culturally appropriate discussions about informed consent, and help overcome problems such as inadequate translations of protocols for communities that may communicate primarily through visual language or storytelling.

Their participation must be "full and effective ... ranging from correct data interpretation and acknowledgment in scientific publication, to negotiating potential long-term commercial benefits, to maintaining ties after the research is completed".

Hayes suggests that access to indigenous communities should come with long-term social commitments to their needs, such as access to water, education and medicines.

She cites her genome sequencing studies of early Southern Africans from Khoesan Namibian communities as an example of successful indigenous participation. The study increased social empowerment by infusing youth with pride about their culture; giving a voice to the communities; and connecting them to local government, the media and human rights leaders.

Link to full article in Science


Science doi:10.1126/science.1205999 (2011)