We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Countries concerned about the reputation and integrity of their research base should reflect on how well they measure up against metrics of responsible scientific competitiveness, says an editorial in Nature

The editorial suggests a number of metrics that can be used to measure the success of science-based innovation. These include 'misconduct metrics' to assess how fraud, fabrication and plagiarism are investigated and punished, and how institutions encourage good practice.

They also include metrics to measure the transparency in a country's evaluation, funding, recruitment and promotion policies, and metrics to assess national frameworks for science policy. A final set of metrics, to measure 'openness' — the receptivity to international partnerships and public criticism — is also needed, says the editorial.

Link to full article in Nature

Related topics