We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

There was a rare blue sky hanging over London’s Dexter House conference centre, the venue for a big data conference hosted by SciDev.Net, as I hurried up to it this morning. And the clear weather was matched by a set of lucid talks.

Out of what was a fascinating morning, I wanted to pick out some remarks from Brad Parks, who took to the stage early on to deliver a keynote talk. Parks is co-executive director at AidData, a research lab based at the College of William and Mary in Virginia, United States.

He began his talk with a vital question: “Can we parley the data revolution into a revolution of accountability?” Several delegates echoed this note of caution at sessions throughout the morning, asking variations of the question: “What are we actually collecting all this data for?”

Parks suggested a handful of conditions he thinks need to be in place to ensure the huge volumes of data nations generate translate into mounting accountability. On top of straightforward access to data, these included data literacy among citizens, feedback mechanisms to return their views to policymakers and commitment from those same officials to actually respond to concerns.

“Without having these in place, we risk launching a revolution that provides a great deal of information and very little accountability,” he said.

But one of Parks’ ideas stood out for me. It was the concept of an ‘infomediary’ — a person who has cultivated special knowledge of open-data tools in their region and can act as a go-to figure for their local community, offering informal support and helping to spread an attitude of data for accountability.

It seemed to me like Parks’ criteria would be useful for any open-data advocate to keep in mind. After all, as he intimated in his talk: “If data isn’t used it really isn’t very useful.” And surely holding the powerful to account is a use we can all get behind.

Joshua Howgego is SciDev.Net’s deputy news and opinions editor.

Related topics