02/12/10

Climate lessons learned ‘after a challenging 12 months’

It has been a challenging 12 months for climate journalists, as they try to keep their audiences informed Copyright: Flickr/ Internews Network

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Climate lessons learned ‘after a challenging 12 months’</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>What lessons has the climate science community learned from</span> the University of East Anglia’s ‘climategate’ e-mails, the  row over a mistake about glaciers by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and disappointment over the Copenhagen climate change negotiations? </p>
<p><em><span>The Yale Forum on Climate Change</span></em> & The <em>Media</em><span> also asks climate scientists what lessons </span>should they learn after a "challenging 12 months" <span>and whether they are putting lessons learned into practice. It puts similar questions to a group of journalists covering climate issues. </span></p>
<p>Responses included the possibility, raised by Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University, United States, that scientists, particularly younger ones, might avoid areas of research associated with public controversy, like climate change, or avoid interacting with government, media or the general public, even to explain the significance of their own research.</p>
<p><span>Several scientists referred to criticisms in phrases such as </span>"organized campaigns of disinformation" or "powerful forces of unreason." Another common thread was encapsulated by Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, United States, with his comment that "every climate scientist (we’re supposed to be smart, eh?) has learned that e-mails must always be assumed to be completely public!"</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2010/11/scientists-and-journalists-on-lessons-learned/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article in <em>The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media</em></a></span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/climate-lessons-learned-after-a-challenging-12-months-1/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/climate-lessons-learned-after-a-challenging-12-months-1/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

What lessons has the climate science community learned from the University of East Anglia’s ‘climategate’ e-mails, the row over a mistake about glaciers by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and disappointment over the Copenhagen climate change negotiations?

The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media also asks climate scientists what lessons should they learn after a "challenging 12 months" and whether they are putting lessons learned into practice. It puts similar questions to a group of journalists covering climate issues.

Responses included the possibility, raised by Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University, United States, that scientists, particularly younger ones, might avoid areas of research associated with public controversy, like climate change, or avoid interacting with government, media or the general public, even to explain the significance of their own research.

Several scientists referred to criticisms in phrases such as "organized campaigns of disinformation" or "powerful forces of unreason." Another common thread was encapsulated by Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute, United States, with his comment that "every climate scientist (we’re supposed to be smart, eh?) has learned that e-mails must always be assumed to be completely public!"

Link to full article in The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media