We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

A fresh batch of stolen emails about climate change, written by scientists from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom, has been released — days before global climate change negotiations begin in Durban, South Africa.

Climate scientists said that the release was likely to have been timed to "torpedo" any potential progress at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 17) next week (28 November–9 December), according to the New York Times.

More than 5,000 emails appear to have been hacked from the same set of records as those stolen in 2009, and the university confirmed that at least some of the emails were authentic.

Following the 2009 incident, it was concluded that the emails did not indicate that scientists had manipulated data, but they were criticised for failing to share data or respond adequately to freedom of information requests.

Climate change sceptic Myron Ebell, who works for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a think tank in the United States, said the new emails were "strong evidence that a small group of scientists centred around East Anglia were engaged in a conspiracy to provide a scientifically misleading assessment of the case for global warming".

But Michael E. Mann, a scientist at Pennsylvania State University, United States — who wrote or received some of the emails — said the emails demonstrated the opposite: "Scientists rely on the ability to have frank, sometimes even contentious discussions with each other. Science requires that."

Mann said he hoped that the new incident would provide clues for British police seeking to catch the hacker or hackers.

Link to full article in The New York Times