We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

In 1992, world leaders pledged to slow the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. But as the deadline approaches, many believe it is unlikely that conservation measures will achieve this goal.

This editorial in Nature highlights a wide gap between scientists monitoring global biodiversity and policymakers trying to prevent its loss. The author points to two crucial reasons why they should work in tandem.

Policymakers wield the political and economic power essential for tackling biodiversity loss. If they understood scientific evidence better (such as research quantifying the financial benefits that ecosystems can provide), they could formulate conservation policies that work at large scales.

Improved communication between the two groups would also help researchers understand and provide the type of information policymakers need to create effective policies.

The editorial adds that national, international, and third-party organisations can all help forge these alliances.

Link to full article in Nature