We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

Hundreds of species under threat of extinction are being left unprotected, according to a new report launched today at the World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa.

The 'Global Gap Analysis' found that around 700 bird, mammal and amphibian species are not covered by the global network of 100,000 officially protected areas — zones that are dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity.

"This analysis clearly shows that there are severe gaps in the protected area system," says Gustavo Fonseca, executive vice president at Conservation International (CI), the US-based campaign and research group that teamed up with the World Conservation Union (IUCN) to produce the report.

Their analysis is the result of a collaborative effort by thousands of scientists around the world to map the geographical range of more than 11,000 species. Tropical areas — specifically rainforests — and islands deserve highest priority for the creation of new protected areas, they say.

By extending the world's protected areas by just 2.6 per cent, the study estimates that two thirds of the 'gap species' could be protected. But the authors also warn that their results should be interpreted carefully.

"The Global Gap Analysis should be regarded as a useful tool to guide the worldwide allocation of conservation spending," says Ana Rodrigues, research fellow with CI. "But [it] cannot be regarded as the final word."

© SciDev.Net 2003

Related topics