We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

At the UN’s COP 20 climate summit in Lima, Peru, advocates are pressing for adaptation to get the same amount of climate funding as mitigation. They also want adaptation to have a stronger presence in any legally binding agreement at next year’s COP 21 meeting in Paris, France.
In light of new figures from the UN Environment Programme that detail the financial cost of adapting to climate change, SciDev.Net talks to Mohamed Adow, senior climate change advisor of the NGO Christian Aid, about what is needed to meet developing countries’ needs for adaptation and in terms of aid for ‘loss and damage’ caused by climate change. He explains how the world can balance adaptation with other pressing development issues, offers examples where financial aid has failed to come through for adaptation and explains why a 50-50 split of funds between mitigation and adaptation is a feasible goal.​