Republish

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

[NEW DELHI] Humans generated a staggering 44.7 million tonnes of e-waste in 2016, which is eight per cent more than the electrical and electronic goods discarded annually just two years ago, says a new study.
 
A report on the study — carried out by the International Telecommunication Union, UN University (UNU) and the International Solid Waste Association — published in The Global E-waste Monitor 2017, lays blame on falling prices that make electronic devices affordable and widely available.
 
In the developing countries, a growing middle class with disposable incomes is buying more electronic goods and also replacing it frequently, the study says. Asia, with its growing economies, accounts for more than 40 per cent of the e-waste generated in the world.  

“Formal waste management ensures that recyclables are recovered and the toxic parts are safely disposed of”

Balde Kees, UN University

 
Those from Oceania, which include Australia and New Zealand, generated 17.3 kilograms of e-waste per person, the highest among the regional groupings. While Africans generated only 1.9 kg of e-waste per person. Asians generated a per capita average of 4.2 kg of e-waste in 2016. However, sub-regional differences varied greatly. While the inhabitants of Brunei, China, Hong Kong and Singapore produced, on average, more than 18 kilograms of e-waste, those of Afghanistan or Nepal hardly produced any.
 
There is little information on the fate of discarded equipment and, according to the study, only 20 per cent of e-waste is “documented to be collected and properly recycled.”  
 
Discarded electronic items are sources of high-value materials including gold, silver, copper, platinum and palladium, and estimated to be worth about US$65 billion.
 
“There is a strong economic incentive to dump the waste or recycle it with inferior standards,” says Balde Kees, study leader and associate programme officer at UNU. This is particularly true of developing countries where formal waste management systems may not exist. “Formal waste management ensures that recyclables are recovered and the toxic parts are safely disposed of,” explains Kees. In developing countries, e-waste is managed by the informal sector and ‘recycled’ with backyard techniques, often at the cost of the health of the workers and the environment, and “leading to inferior recyclates (raw materials sent to and processed in waste recycling plants) or even dumping,” he adds.
 
P. Parthasarathy, managing director of E-Parisara Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, a recycling firm, believes that efforts need to be made to educate the informal recycling sector and regularise it. “The government and NGOs could run programmes to educate the informal sector and provide it with technical and financial support,” he says.
 
This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Asia & Pacific desk.