We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

[AUCKLAND] How should scientists interact with politicians? That was a hot topic on the opening day of the Science Advice to Governments conference in Auckland, New Zealand (28-29 August).
Convened by the International Council for Science, I’m here along with delegates — most of them scientists — from 47 countries.
Peter Gluckman, the chief science advisor  to New Zealand’s prime minister, opened the event by saying that scientists should be “honest knowledge brokers” for governments, rather than advocates or lobbyists.
“The advisory system must have the trust of policymaker and politician, especially when there’s a big gap between science and ideology,” he said.
But the relationship between science and policy is often complicated by a variety of factors, Gluckman and other scientists said throughout the day. Governments like to demand hard scientific conclusions as justification for policies, for example, but the scientific process tends to yield nuances and caveats.
And while some scientific advisors are independent, others work directly for governments. That science should influence politics while also remaining independent is a “core tension” in the relationship, noted Roger Pielke Jr., director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado, United States.
The vast majority of panelists though were from developed countries. That left me wondering: Are lessons about the tricky relationship between science and politics in the developed world also relevant in developing countries?
I put the question to Malegapuru Makgoba, vice president of the International Council for Science and vice chancellor of the University of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa.
“The contexts are different but the challenges are the same,” he told me during a conference break.
Makgoba said one contextual difference is that science has never had a central influence on political decisions in developing countries, as it has for generations across the developed world. Politicians in much of Africa, he added, are therefore less likely to develop science-based policies — much less send delegates to science events in New Zealand.
Fola Babalola, a Nigerian forester who was sitting nearby, observed that African researchers were glaringly under-represented at the Auckland conference. That was a pity, he said, because they might have learned something useful and brought it home.
He pointed to West Africa, where an Ebola epidemic is raging, as one place where governments could certainly benefit from good advice from the scientific community.
Link to Science Advice to Governments summit

This article has been produced by SciDev.Net's South-East Asia & Pacific desk.