We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

The earthquake that caused widespread devastation in the Indian Ocean on 26 December was detected immediately by global networks of seismometers operated by developed countries, and its potential to form a tsunami was quickly recognised.

But the poor countries subsequently affected lack both the sensors required to detect and track a tsunami, and the infrastructure needed to take advantage of disaster alerts.

Writing in the Los Angeles Times, seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam and two of his colleagues say that technology that could have reduced the tsunami's death toll and the damage it caused already exists, and is not expensive.

They say the same applies to hurricanes in the Caribbean, drought in Africa, landslides in the Andes, and that access to knowledge and technology that can protect lives should be a human right.

However, they say, disaster recovery funds are rarely used to pay for infrastructure needed to mitigate future events, despite the costs of pre-emptive action being lower than the costs of responding to a disaster.

Highlighting this, the authors call for greater investment by rich countries in scientific and technological capacity of poorer countries. This, they say, would not only reduce the impact of disasters in such countries, but also boost their development.

Link to full article in the Los Angeles Times*

*free registration to the Los Angeles Times is required to view this document