We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

The bird flu virus that killed 34 people in South-East Asia last year is not easily transmitted from person to person. But if it were to exchange genes with a mammalian flu virus, we could witness a global flu pandemic, which would threaten the lives of tens of millions of people.

Yet, argues an editorial in this week's Nature, governments continue to ignore the threat. Surveillance in Asia is insufficient to monitor the progress of the virus. Moreover, governments around the world are unprepared to handle a viral pandemic of any kind.

Rich governments are not inclined to help poor countries monitor animal viruses because they see it as a form of economic assistance. In this, they ignore the global threat posed by these viruses.

Furthermore, few rich countries have stockpiled flu drugs or made any effort to increase the infrastructure to enable them to produce the volume of drugs and vaccine doses that will be needed should a pandemic occur.

The World Health Organization has stated that the world is not prepared for the next pandemic, whatever its scale. Nature calls the state of global inaction on this issue "scandalous".

Link to full article in Nature

Reference: Nature 433, 91 (2005)