We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

When, in spring 2014, it became clear that the Ebola outbreak was spreading uncontrollably in West Africa, doctors and NGOs from all over the world rushed to help.
However, the task proved to be harder than anticipated — not only because of the lack of a vaccine or effective treatments, but also because the response ‘machine’ proved difficult to manage.
This audio slideshow features an epidemiologist and an anthropologist from different institutions in the United Kingdom who worked in the field and witnessed a fragmented crisis response.
Freya Jephcott and Annie Wilkinson looked at two different aspects of the crisis — the epidemiological and social — but reached similar conclusions about the need to improve communication and coordination. Among the lessons to take from the epidemic, they include the need to recognise and support the domestic healthcare capacity that will have to keep local people safe once the foreign agencies have left.

This article is part of our Spotlight, Managing health crises after Ebola.