Skip Navigation

读者来信

Don't label all biofuel programmes the same

Steven Savage

Científico agrícola, California

2008年1月3日 | EN | ES

Biofuels done the wrong way are certainly a bad thing for the poor and for the environment (see Biofuel revolution threatens food security for the poor). That does not mean that all biofuel production scenarios fit into that mould.

Climate change driven by greenhouse gas emissions will also most immediately affect the poor who depend on subsistence agriculture.

There is a balance here. Food and biofuel production have a global element, but there is also a very strong regional component. Growing Miscanthus grasses for cellulosic biofuel in the American southeast, which is a highly inefficient place to grow corn, is not really a threat to food for the poor elsewhere; export-oriented expansion of palm oil production in Indonesia that takes out natural vegetation or food-producing land is.

In reality, there are good and bad biofuels, both from an environmental and a social perspective. They should not be lumped into one bin.

添加你的评论

所有的评论都要接受审核,我们保留对评中包括 不适当/不适合的语言进行编辑的权利。科学与发展网络享有网站发布所有内容的版权。请查看使用条款了解详情。

您需要注册后发表评论或者给作者发送评论的邮件。请登陆或注册。 登陆 或者 注册.

返回 读者来信
到达顶部